[Ometa] Parametrized rules in OMeta

[Andrey Fedorov]

Hi Alex,

2010/1/7 Alessandro Warth <alexwarth at gmail.com>

> infix('mulExpr',  '+') | infix('mulExpr',  '-') | mulExpr,


So there's a metaphor clash here in my mind. I would have expected:

infix(mulExpr,  '+') | infix(mulExpr,  '-') | mulExpr,


This would be consistent with the analogy to `mulExpr' being a variable
name, and `infix' - a function. Is there a reason this is impossible, or
just something you didn't get a chance to implement?

Might simplify things, as it might also alleviate the need for `apply' in
higher-order rule definitions.

Cheers,
Andrey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://vpri.org/pipermail/ometa/attachments/20100110/aa99099c/attachme=
nt.htm